PARLIAMENT ERUPTS IN TOTAL CHAOS! A massive showdown over YOUR energy bills just broke every rule in the House! Reform UK’s Richard Tice dropped a bombshell that could save the UK billions, but a furious Green MP completely lost it and broke parliamentary protocol! The Deputy Speaker had to step in as the shouting escalated. But Tice’s brutal final insult to the green agenda changes everything… See details in the first comment

Tice opened the debate by pointing out the stark contrast between UK and US energy costs, stating that US gas prices are a “mere 20%” of those in the UK. He attributed this economic advantage to the United States’ embrace of hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as fracking, over the past two decades. Tice argued that the UK possesses vast unexploited resources, claiming there are 30 to 50 years’ worth of onshore gas available across the country . He further asserted that Lincolnshire alone holds a decade’s worth of shale gas, which he argued could generate “thousands and thousands” of domestic jobs .

The Green Party MP strongly rebuked these assertions, interrupting to point out that there are currently no commercially proven reserves of shale gas in the UK . She repeatedly demanded that Tice cite his sources for the reserve estimates, arguing that actual evidence shows the cost of renewable energy consistently declining.
The exchange momentarily broke parliamentary protocol, prompting an intervention from the Deputy Speaker.
The Deputy Speaker had to remind the Green MP of the courtesies of the House, noting that turning her back to the chair to face Tice made it difficult for microphones to pick up her comments and violated parliamentary convention .
When pressed repeatedly for his sources, Tice cited estimates from the British Geological Survey and referenced specific tests conducted in the Gainsborough Trough.
The Green MP dismissed these domestic fossil fuel ambitions as a “complete distraction.” She argued that opening new fossil fuel production would do almost nothing to lower consumer bills or improve energy security. She compared further investments in fossil fuels to investing in “typewriters during the era of the personal computer” or “horses and carriages during the era of the development of the car,” insisting that a clean, renewable energy transition is the country’s only viable hope .
To counter Tice’s claims of mass job creation, she referenced the Jackdaw gas field, stating it would generate only 27 jobs—a number of people she noted could fit on the top of a double-decker bus.
Tice retorted sharply, accusing the Green MP of promoting a policy direction that would effectively offshore British wealth, skills, and jobs. He characterized her stance as one that would leave the British public “impoverished in a tent on a sandbag” by refusing to utilize domestic natural resources.
The confrontation underscores the deep, ongoing ideological divide in Parliament regarding how to best secure the UK’s energy independence while navigating environmental concerns and a volatile global energy market.
